Progressive Inquiry
Du er i: projekt administration / Administration af videns typer / ser Progressive Inquiry
 
 
 

Progressive Inquiry

Learning can be seen as a research practice aiming to solve a group's
understanding of a subject by creating a visible discussion of research
challenges, theories, scientific facts and summaries. The process aims to
be progressive in its approach by starting from initial problems and ideas
of the students and then becoming progressively more challenging through
creation of more elaborate problems, theories and research practices.

The Progressive Inquiry knowledge types aim to scaffold a learning community
to follow the process of setting up research problems, making current
knowledge visible and working from there to deepen the understanding on
the issue by creating discussion notes. The reading and writing of these
notes is seen as the key momentum of the process, helping learners to
structure their ideas based on the principle of scientific research.

Problem

Your study problem in research. The learning process aims at answering
to the problems presented by the students. The purpose of defining a
problem statement is to explicate your learning goals, to explain your
research interests and also to introduce the questions that are
directing your inquiry. After critically viewing the present working
theories and by introducing new deepening knowledge to the discussion,
also new subordinate problems can be defined.

My Explanation

My Explanation presents your own conceptions (hypothesis, theory,
explanation, interpretation) about the problems presented by yourself or
some of your fellow students. "My Explanation" is not necessarily well
defined or articulated early in the inquiry process. However, it is
crucial that the explication of your explanations evolves during the
process and your working theories become more refined and developed.

Scientific Explanation

Scientific Explanation presents some scientific findings or other
knowledge that you have sought. Under Scientific Explanation you may
brings to the discussion some new points of view or otherwise helps the
inquiry process to continue. It differs from your own explanation (My
Explanation) in that it represents knowledge produced by others,
generally some authority or expert. My Explanations should be your own
ideas where as Scientific Explanation is some ones else idea in the area
in concern.

Evaluation of the Process

Your comment that focuses on the inquiry process and its methods
instead of the process outcomes - meta-comment. With a "Evaluation of
the Process" you may evaluate e.g. whether the process is progressing in
the desired direction, whether appropriate methods are used, how sharing
of tasks and inquiry process is accomplished among the members of the
learning community.

Summary

With a summary you draw pieces of the discussion together and provide
inferences based on the discussion in the Knowledge Building. The
summary may aim at identifying a new Course Context or may reflect the
views of the writer on the progression of the inquiry learning process.