Progressive Inquiry
Learning can be seen as a research practice aiming to solve
a group's understanding of a subject by creating a visible
discussion of research challenges, theories, scientific
facts and summaries. The process aims to be progressive in
its approach by starting from initial problems and ideas of
the students and then becoming progressively more challenging
through creation of more elaborate problems, theories and
research practices.
The Progressive Inquiry knowledge types aim to scaffold a
learning community to follow the process of setting up
research problems, making current knowledge visible and
working from there to deepen the understanding on the issue
by creating discussion notes. The reading and writing of
these notes is seen as the key momentum of the process,
helping learners to structure their ideas based on the
principle of scientific research.
|
Problem
Your study problem in research. The learning process aims
at answering to the problems presented by the students. The
purpose of defining a problem statement is to explicate
your learning goals, to explain your research interests and
also to introduce the questions that are directing your
inquiry. After critically viewing the present
working theories and by introducing new deepening knowledge
to the discussion, also new subordinate problems can be
defined. |
My Explanation
My Explanation presents your own conceptions (hypothesis,
theory, explanation, interpretation) about the problems
presented by yourself or some of your fellow students. "My
Explanation" is not necessarily well defined or articulated
early in the inquiry process. However, it is crucial that
the explication of your explanations evolves during
the process and your working theories become more refined
and developed. |
Scientific Explanation
Scientific Explanation presents some scientific findings or
other knowledge that you have sought. Under Scientific
Explanation you may brings to the discussion some new
points of view or otherwise helps the inquiry process to
continue. It differs from your own explanation
(My Explanation) in that it represents knowledge produced
by others, generally some authority or expert. My
Explanations should be your own ideas where as Scientific
Explanation is some ones else idea in the area in
concern. |
Evaluation of the Process
Your comment that focuses on the inquiry process and its
methods instead of the process outcomes - meta-comment.
With a "Evaluation of the Process" you may evaluate e.g.
whether the process is progressing in the desired
direction, whether appropriate methods are used, how
sharing of tasks and inquiry process is accomplished among
the members of the learning community. |
Summary
With a summary you draw pieces of the discussion together
and provide inferences based on the discussion in the
Knowledge Building. The summary may aim at identifying a
new Course Context or may reflect the views of the writer
on the progression of the inquiry learning
process. |